The amazing denial of what "conspiracy kooks" really means....
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: Autymn D. C. on 10 Jan 2007 20:35 Henry, so when do your "scientific" simulations show what happens when a fat 500-mi./h plane crashes into a tower?
From: Rob Kleinschmidt on 10 Jan 2007 21:30 Autymn D. C. wrote: > Henry, so when do your "scientific" simulations show what happens when > a fat 500-mi./h plane crashes into a tower? The CIA sneaks in and blows up the tower ???
From: Mike on 10 Jan 2007 21:37 "Rob Kleinschmidt" <Rkleinsch1216128(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:1168482607.969902.182190(a)i39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... > > Autymn D. C. wrote: >> Henry, so when do your "scientific" simulations show what happens when >> a fat 500-mi./h plane crashes into a tower? > > The CIA sneaks in and blows up the tower ??? No no no. You have it all wrong! There was no "plane"! It was a holographic projection, beamed by the same fake "radio towers" the Evil Gummint uses to broadcast the Mind Control Rays! It was then a simple matter to blow up the tower at the same time the "plane" hit it, using the previously planted bombs! Mike
From: kirb on 11 Jan 2007 12:56 Henry wrote: > But of course, no one has because > science, physics, eyewitness testimony, and the hard evidence > support demoliton. > > The massive steel frames of the towers were far too strong to > collapse only under their own weight. Let's start talking about the physics required to blow up all the concrete floors to dust (as you state) along with everything needed to pull off what you think happened. How much of whatever material you would need would be required? How much time to place this material would be required? Where would all this material be placed? Who would place all this material, set up all the detonations, and pull this off undetected? Where is the truth bowel movement stand on research BEFORE the attack, or whatever you call it The real physics are that it would be IMPOSSIBLE to haul in that much explosive undetected, put it in the critical places (every floor, acording to Hanky), conduct a full building detonation, and pull this off without ONE person shooting their mouth off. How is this possible. It's easy to sit here and say the planes could not have made the twin towers fall, but NO ONE is stating HOW any other situation could have been pulled off. How, hanky boy, how? Kirb
From: Henry on 13 Jan 2007 09:37
kirb wrote: > Henry wrote: >> The massive steel frames of the towers were far too strong to >> collapse only under their own weight. That's been proved through >> physics, and that's why no other steel framed buildings have ever >> collapsed that way unless they were demolished. See Gordon Ross' >> excellent paper on momentum transfer on this page: > http://worldtradecentertruth.com/ > How much of whatever material you would need would be required? > How much time to place this material would be required? > Where would all this material be placed? > Who would place all this material, set up all the detonations, and pull > this off undetected? Conspiracy kook denial and avoidance tactics #12 & #14. http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050116064744556 ============================================================== Observe the rotating and disintegrating block on the South Tower. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc2exp4.html Notice that the corners are curved, as the block's internal destruction is already taking place. If it had not been destroyed via demolition, it would have continued to rotate and fall off the building as an intact block. Also, notice that the block is tilting towards the corner where it was impacted. The opposite corner was undamaged by impact or fire, as proved by photo evidence. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc2exp1.html As the top section of that tower is rotating, the high strength, fire resistant perimeter columns on one side of the building are being compressed, and on the opposite side, where the building was not damaged by fire or impact, they're being pulled apart. Why do you think the undamaged steel perimeter frame with no weight above it is exploding and collapsing at the same rate as the fire and impact damaged side that is being compressed? Seems more than a little odd, doesn't it? Here's some information on the perimeter columns. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/perimeter.html Now watch the video titled, "Close-up of South Tower collapse on this page: http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/collapse%20update/#videos That certainly isn't the gradual bending and buckling of an over heated steel frame. Those are clearly very powerful explosions. -- |