From: Bill Miller. on
On Aug 9, 5:52 pm, "Susan \(CobbersMom\)" <dittohead1...(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:

"Bill Miller." wrote in message   So I guess it just boilsdown to
finding
tires that fit the current wheels that are more"highway-friendly."

> There is nothing "unhighway-'unfriendly" about the tires that come on the TW.  

Except for the fact that the tires I linked to would be "more
friendly" on the highway than the straight knobbies of the stock TW200
and still remain somewhat friendly to off-road use.

>If you want a street bike, why not just buy one and ride tha occasionally/seldom off road?  I've done that with my VStar and would much rather have knobby tires on the highway than street tires off road.
> Sue

Because, as I stated, the TW200 provided me with the best fit and the
196cc motor with enough power to fit my needs. It's just too bad that
Yamaha doesn't produce a street bike in the 150-200 cc category and
this conversation wouldn't even be happening. And the tires I linked
to are not straight "street tires," just more of an on-road style than
the stock knobbies on the TW200. And I believe that most would agree
that the front tire I linked to would provide better steering and
handling than the stock TW200's fron tire, especially perhaps in wet
weather. Here's that link again...

http://www.motorcycle-superstore.com/2/29/393/14780/ITEM/Bridgestone-TW203-Trail-Wing-Dual-Sport-Front-Tire.aspx

I think if you compare the tread on this one with the stock TW200
you'll see how it is perhaps more highway-friendly while still
functional for light off-road riding.

Bill


From: The Older Gentleman on
.. <yefelnagrom(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Aug 9, 3:33?pm, "Bill Miller." <jay-smith-1...(a)excite.com> wrote:
>
> > How about these two? ?They're purportedly 80% on-road and 20% off-
> > road.
>
> Bridgestone's MC tire site might be helpful in researching those
> tires.
>
> http://www.motorcycle-karttires.com/
>
>
> The tread pattern looks like it would be much better for pavement
> riding. You will see similar tread patterns on big adventure tourers
> like BMW.
>
> Those big heavy bikes will wear out a dual sport tire in a few
> thousand miles, but it's hard to say what the tire life would be like
> on the TW200...

Tread patterna have surprisingly little effect on street riding (within
reason - huge gaps and big blocks are a different matter). Their main
function is water clearing.

Actual dry weather tyre grip is much more a function of the type of
rubber used..

--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Yamaha XT600E Honda CB400F & SH50
GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60
The bells, the bells.....
From: Bill Miller. on
I'm not saying that the stock knobbies on the TW200 are road
unfriendly or that they're terrible. We're not talking about black or
white here but about degrees.

Anyone looking at the stock knobbies on the TW200 can clearly see that
they are primarily designed for off-road (non-pavement) use. True or
false?

Then when you look at the two tires in the link I provided, anyone can
clearly see that the tread on those tires leans more toward on-road
(pavement_ use than off-road.

That's all I was saying---that these two tires ...

FRONT:

http://www.motorcycle-superstore.com/2/29/393/14780/ITEM/Bridgestone-TW203-Trail-Wing-Dual-Sport-Front-Tire.aspx

and REAR:

http://www.motorcycle-superstore.com/2/29/393/14781/ITEM/Bridgestone-TW204-Trail-Wing-Dual-Sport-Rear-Tire.aspx

....are not "superior" to the stock tires but only that they appear to
have a tread better suited for on-road (pavement) use. True or
false? Nothing more!

And if that's the case, and most (approximately 80%) of my riding will
be on-road (pavement) then why wouldn't I replace the stock tires with
these? No need to carry this discussion into any other areas. It's a
rather simple selection...pick choice A (stock tires) or choice B (the
tires shown in the links) for a bike that going to be driven on-road
(pavement) at least 80% of the time and the other 20% of "off-road"
use will be very light and easy trails and/or dirt/gravel secondary
roads.

If you truly think, based solely upon the planned uses I've described
for my particular situation, that this idea has no merit, then please
give me the facts and data to refute what I've just said regarding
these two choices of tires. No generalizations needed about this or
that but please just pick choice A or choice B and W-H-Y. Thank you.
Bill
From: Blattus Slafaly on
Bill Miller. wrote:
> On Aug 9, 5:52 pm, "Susan \(CobbersMom\)" <dittohead1...(a)yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> "Bill Miller." wrote in message So I guess it just boilsdown to
> finding
> tires that fit the current wheels that are more"highway-friendly."
>
>> There is nothing "unhighway-'unfriendly" about the tires that come on the TW.
>
> Except for the fact that the tires I linked to would be "more
> friendly" on the highway than the straight knobbies of the stock TW200
> and still remain somewhat friendly to off-road use.
>
>> If you want a street bike, why not just buy one and ride tha occasionally/seldom off road? I've done that with my VStar and would much rather have knobby tires on the highway than street tires off road.
>> Sue
>
> Because, as I stated, the TW200 provided me with the best fit and the
> 196cc motor with enough power to fit my needs. It's just too bad that
> Yamaha doesn't produce a street bike in the 150-200 cc category and
> this conversation wouldn't even be happening. And the tires I linked
> to are not straight "street tires," just more of an on-road style than
> the stock knobbies on the TW200. And I believe that most would agree
> that the front tire I linked to would provide better steering and
> handling than the stock TW200's fron tire, especially perhaps in wet
> weather. Here's that link again...
>
> http://www.motorcycle-superstore.com/2/29/393/14780/ITEM/Bridgestone-TW203-Trail-Wing-Dual-Sport-Front-Tire.aspx
>
> I think if you compare the tread on this one with the stock TW200
> you'll see how it is perhaps more highway-friendly while still
> functional for light off-road riding.
>
> Bill
>
>
What kind of gas mileage does a 250 street get?

--
Blattus Slafaly ? 3 :) 7/8
From: . on
On Aug 10, 12:27�am, "Bill Miller." <jay-smith-1...(a)excite.com> wrote:

> Anyone looking at the stock knobbies on the TW200 can clearly see that
> they are primarily designed for off-road (non-pavement) use. �True or
> false?

TW200 was designed as a beach cruiser. If you go to ride the dunes at
Pismo, you'd want a paddle tire.

The knobbie tire is designed to dig into loose soil and find traction
below.

The height of the knobs depends upon how deep the loose soil is on top
of the hard packed surface below.

Radical knobbies have widely-spaced knobs that are an inch tall, less
radical knobbie have lower knobs that are more closely spaced.

The relative softness or hardness of a knobby depends on just how hard
(or deep) the substrate is.
>
> Then when you look at the two tires in the link I provided, anyone can
> clearly see that the tread on those tires leans more toward on-road
> (pavement_ use than off-road.

The more street-oriented tread relies more upon the pavement surface
digging into the rubber and providing traction like a street tire does.