From: The Older Gentleman on
don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote:

> >I held out a little olive branch there, and I'm holding it out again.
> >You have expressed constant scepticism and you have implied a belief it
> >doesn't exist - don't argue, now, you have.
>
> Bullshit! My requests to read the article were polite and sincere.
> Show me where I said the article doesn't exist. You can't because I
> didn't.

Don, I have never posted that you said it doesn't exist.

For the third time of asking in this thread: let's drop it, shall we? I
think you are becoming increasingly irrational, and it's the best thing
for both of us, and reeky.


--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple
Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes!
Try Googling before asking a damn silly question.
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
From: Mark Olson on
The Older Gentleman wrote:
> don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote:
>
>>> I held out a little olive branch there, and I'm holding it out again.
>>> You have expressed constant scepticism and you have implied a belief it
>>> doesn't exist - don't argue, now, you have.
>> Bullshit! My requests to read the article were polite and sincere.
>> Show me where I said the article doesn't exist. You can't because I
>> didn't.

<takes deep breath>

Right here, Don:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.motorcycles/msg/26767dcc6b8cd410
=====================================================================
Bottom line, I asked you to post the article you claimed to write for
Bike Magazine. You refused. You have your reasons for refusing and
while I don't agree they are valid, it is your choice whether to post
the article or not.
=====================================================================

The way I read it, when you said "claimed to write", the implication was
crystal clear. You implied that TOG didn't actually write it. Why would
I think that's what you meant? Easy. You've repeatedly called TOG
a liar. Given that, using "claimed to write" instead of simply saying
"wrote" is unambiguous. Do I have it wrong?

I also think you know this, but I'm going to explicitly say it. TOG makes
his living working for a trade paper on a completely different subject,
his motorcycle stuff is a sideline. FWIW, I was emailed a copy of a
relatively recent article he wrote for Bike magazine from someone on UKRM
who scanned it (it was "ogden", not TOG, obviously since he doesn't own
the copyright after selling it to Bike).

http://groups.google.com/group/uk.rec.motorcycles/msg/a621b625e6642754

I've tried to stay out of your feud with TOG. You're a friend. I respect
you. I'm jumping in with my size 13s now because I think you've both
taken the personal angle much too far for otherwise decent people.

Both of you have said some very inflammatory things to each other.
Now it's time for *both* of you to show a little sense and to stop making
yourselves look like asses. No one is winning an argument when it's
obvious that the exchange has degenerated into 99.9% personal attacks.
From: The Older Gentleman on
don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote:

> Do what you think is best for you Neil. I doubt very much you want to
> back away from this discussion, in the best interests of Reeky.
>

Actually, I am and I do and I have done.

I genuinely think you have some mental issues and there just isn't any
point in sparring with someone like that, so there we go.

It would be nice to think that you'll abandon your promise to keep on
'jabbing' in any thread you choose.


--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple
Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes!
Try Googling before asking a damn silly question.
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
From: The Older Gentleman on
don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote:

<snip>

This is my last word on this subject.

--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple
Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes!
Try Googling before asking a damn silly question.
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
From: don (Calgary) on
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 20:18:45 +0000, totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk (The
Older Gentleman) wrote:

>don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>This is my last word on this subject.

Heh. I take it, then, that my assessment of your motives in this
thread were spot on.