For the nosy types
in [Motorcycles]
|
From: TOG on 2 Jun 2010 06:10 On 2 June, 06:05, Chuck Rhode <CRh...(a)LacusVeris.com> wrote: <snip> Oh, yeah, BP's going to face the music, no question. But they won't be the only ones. Will BP survive? Toughie. There have been worse environmental and/or human cost disasters (in fact, one that combines both springs instantly to mind) and companies have survived. The UK press is wondering whether BP's plunging share price would make it vulnerable to a takeover, which is certainly possible.
From: don (Calgary) on 2 Jun 2010 18:25 On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 07:16:22 +0100, totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk (The Older Gentleman) wrote: >don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote: > >> Hmmmm, not a word in the entire hour about the regulators. >> >> Seems you are a little off base again Neil. > >*One* broadcast. Oh, yes, very representative. It was the one I mentioned. I could have selected any of the news reports I have seen in the past week or two. Same result.
From: don (Calgary) on 2 Jun 2010 18:43 On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 07:16:23 +0100, totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk (The Older Gentleman) wrote: > >International hard news is hard news, no matter what you write about, be >it crops or minerals. Giving that kind of latitude, the definition of hard news would include virtually all trade magazines, bloggers, right down to community newsletters. I am sure you see it that way, but I find it comical you consider a limited distribution trade magazine part of the mainstream news media. >Like I said, you don't understand the news media >*at all*. Your ignorance is breathtaking, in fact. But the ignorance >frequently sneer at what they don't understand. Its not the first time >you've done it, actually. It's a shame you are unable to engage in a mature discussion free of the cheap personal invectives. But then again, that is you. Almost all of your messages have a similar theme running through them.
From: The Older Gentleman on 3 Jun 2010 02:17 don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 07:16:22 +0100, totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk (The > Older Gentleman) wrote: > > >don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote: > > > >> Hmmmm, not a word in the entire hour about the regulators. > >> > >> Seems you are a little off base again Neil. > > > >*One* broadcast. Oh, yes, very representative. > > It was the one I mentioned. I could have selected any of the news > reports I have seen in the past week or two. Same result. So because *you* haven't bothered to look properly, that means there's been no mention? Yup, that fits with your previous behaviour. Carry on, then. -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes! Try Googling before asking a damn silly question. chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
From: don (Calgary) on 3 Jun 2010 18:24
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 07:17:54 +0100, totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk (The Older Gentleman) wrote: >don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 07:16:22 +0100, totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk (The >> Older Gentleman) wrote: >> >> >don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote: >> > >> >> Hmmmm, not a word in the entire hour about the regulators. >> >> >> >> Seems you are a little off base again Neil. >> > >> >*One* broadcast. Oh, yes, very representative. >> >> It was the one I mentioned. I could have selected any of the news >> reports I have seen in the past week or two. Same result. > >So because *you* haven't bothered to look properly, that means there's >been no mention? > >Yup, that fits with your previous behaviour. Carry on, then. You should read these messages a little more carefully. Your lack of comprehension is becoming more and more common. |