I'd be a poorer man...
in [Motorcycles]
|
Prev: Why do I Look
Next: Adolph the Great
From: krusty kritter on 6 Mar 2010 12:26 On Mar 6, 9:03 am, Bruce Jensen <bpnjen...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Mar 5, 6:52 pm, "Long Ranger" <worpyl...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > Saying ridiculous > > things like "California ought to round 'em up and deport them" when > > the State of California has no such legal authority is also not > > helpful. I agree, our immigration laws should be staunchly applied > > and illegal aliens should be removed; > > > How do you reconcile those two sentences? > > I answered this in private e-mail, so you know the answer. My original statement, which *you* misquoted, was "I calculated that California could save $26 billion a year if we just rounded up all the Mexicans and deported them." You just want to quibble about *who* ought to deport the illegals, of which there are at least ten million in California alone. If our elected officials weren't pimping themselves to the hispanics to get re-elected, they'd order ICE to round up all 40 million Mexicans and send them back where they belong. Right now, one out of every five Mexicans is living in the USA and competing with Americans for jobs, living space, medical care and the benefits of education. Why should we even have a *country* if we are going to say that anybody and everybody has the right to come here? The public has tested the notion of Mirandizing enemy combatants and repudiated it, they have examined the notion of civil trials for the 9/11 conspirators and rejected that too. How long is it going to take for "We, the (White) People" to wake up and reject the Mud Flood? No country has ever established itself on the principle that immigrant scumbags are equal to the decent people that founded it.
From: krusty kritter on 6 Mar 2010 14:25 On Mar 6, 11:16 am, You <y...(a)shadow.orgs> wrote: > My family backed the Loyalists during the Revolution, and had to flee to > Canada for 100 years, then snuck back south to Kansas, after the Civil > War..... Weren't a lot of folks checking the Northern Boarder back in > those days Members of my family helped the British kick the Acadians out of Nova Scotia and then went up there to be rich Northern Plantation owners. But they came back to fight for the Union side at Vicksburg during the American Civil War. One of the descendants of that bunch became governor of Oregon.
From: S'mee on 6 Mar 2010 17:57 On Mar 6, 12:25 pm, krusty kritter <breoganmacbr...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Mar 6, 11:16 am, You <y...(a)shadow.orgs> wrote: > > > My family backed the Loyalists during the Revolution, and had to flee to > > Canada for 100 years, then snuck back south to Kansas, after the Civil > > War..... Weren't a lot of folks checking the Northern Boarder back in > > those days > > Members of my family helped the British kick the Acadians out of Nova > Scotia and then went up there to be rich Northern Plantation owners. > But they came back to fight for the Union side at Vicksburg during the > American Civil War. One of the descendants of that bunch became > governor of Oregon. heh, I had family in country before 1700 (just another Hazard) the other side came in by way of SURPRISE canada...just in time to beat the land run in indian territory. Yep original sooners.
From: S'mee on 6 Mar 2010 17:58 On Mar 6, 12:25 pm, krusty kritter <breoganmacbr...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: Liar...your family ALL came over in the 1890's with the other irish scum bags, thieves, murderers adn drunken sheep raping malcontents.
From: Bruce Jensen on 6 Mar 2010 20:59
On Mar 6, 9:26 am, krusty kritter <breoganmacbr...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Mar 6, 9:03 am, Bruce Jensen <bpnjen...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 5, 6:52 pm, "Long Ranger" <worpyl...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > Saying ridiculous > > > things like "California ought to round 'em up and deport them" when > > > the State of California has no such legal authority is also not > > > helpful. I agree, our immigration laws should be staunchly applied > > > and illegal aliens should be removed; > > > > How do you reconcile those two sentences? > > > I answered this in private e-mail, so you know the answer. > > My original statement, which *you* misquoted, was "I calculated that > California could save $26 billion a year if we just rounded up all the > Mexicans and deported them." > > You just want to quibble about *who* ought to deport the illegals, of > which there are at least ten million in California alone. > > If our elected officials weren't pimping themselves to the hispanics > to get re-elected, they'd order ICE to round up all 40 million > Mexicans and send them back where they belong. Then elect someone else. Nobody's stopping you. > Right now, one out of every five Mexicans is living in the USA and > competing with Americans for jobs, living space, medical care and the > benefits of education. Then "Americans" better get with the program again, eh? Lazy, shiftless losers. > Why should we even have a *country* if we are going to say that > anybody and everybody has the right to come here? I agree! I love the "One-World-Government" idea! :-D > The public has tested the notion of Mirandizing enemy combatants and > repudiated it, they have examined the notion of civil trials for the > 9/11 conspirators and rejected that too. The public also voted for Obama, because they 'wuz sick of subhumans like you. |