Prev: Changing crank seals on an RD-400
Next: pɐǝɥ ɹnoʎ pǝǝɟ
From: don (Calgary) on 29 Nov 2009 11:21 On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:04:36 +0000 (UTC), Bob Mann <bobmann(a)mtsremove.net> wrote: >"don (Calgary)" <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote in >news:s9l2h51e2uom3mkbqpq8imgke75v41o3c4(a)4ax.com: > >> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:57:39 +0000 (UTC), Bob Mann >> <bobmann(a)mtsremove.net> wrote: >> >>>"don (Calgary)" <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote in >>>news:gcb1h5duh0e8n8lo3upvmlb5oj42gqftor(a)4ax.com: >>> >>>> All the info I read indicated the sludge problem was specific to the >>>> 2.7. Is it a problem with the 4.7 too? >>>> >>> >>>If it is, my Jeep will be gone quickly. >> >> After my Dakota! >> > >Actually, I've been thinking about downsizing to a Patriot anyway. >I like the power but the gas mileage is poor. >The Patriot does all I need it to do. Have you driven a Patriot? I took one for a test drive a couple of months ago and felt it was a cut below the Cherokee and Grand Cherokee for quality, road noise and comfort. Of course, after I tossed the idea of buying another new(er) [1] vehicle I ended up with a used Dakota, which is also a cut below its competitors when it comes to quality, road noise and comfort. Gas mileage is less of an issue for me. My last tank of gas (in the truck) lasted me over five weeks. It would have lasted longer if I didn't drive the truck to Red Deer last month. And the Dakota is a fuel hog. Hard to believe if I want to drive four wheels for fuel economy I need to take the Jag. [1] I usually look for something less than a year old with 10,000 kms or so on the clock. |