Prev: Germany 4 English.Sheep.Shaggers 1
Next: Sad Dad
From: frag on 1 Jul 2010 14:06
In article <891iavFjqnU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
the.best.names.are.gone(a)gmail.com says...
>
> >>> The numbers it has now are on two bikes, right?
> >> Um, Frag, you don't really understand how written-off bikes are given
> >> new identities, do you?
> >
> > Yes I do, but as Lozzo correctly guessed I was thinking "cloned" bike
> > rather than transferring the identity of a written off bike.
>
> You number plate smudgers always think that.

You think anyone could participate in UKRM and not end up suspicious?

Damn fool, you is!

--
frag
From: frag on 1 Jul 2010 14:11
In article <4c2ba39a$0$12155$fa0fcedb(a)news.zen.co.uk>,
sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk says...
>
> sweller wrote:
> > TOG(a)Toil wrote:
> >
> >> It's easy for people to say: "Take it to Plod. Don't sell it on. Do
> >> the decent thing." when you can afford the luxury of saying that.
> >
> > What about the poor fucker who owned it originally - who probably
> > couldn't afford the luxury of losing his NCB etc?
> >
> > You can't just pick and choose morality - taking this kind of stance
> > that it's ok not to do the right thing undermines any future
> > pronouncements you may make in the future.
>
> That doesn't quite fit. The original owner wouldn't benefit in any way now.

The fact the original owner would gain nothing has absolutely no bearing
on the morality of the decision being taken now.

It's not cumulative.


--
frag
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Prev: Germany 4 English.Sheep.Shaggers 1
Next: Sad Dad