Is Puerto Rico onto something here?
in [Motorcycles]
|
Prev: The Usual Mexican Fifth Column Traitors seek to thwart Arizona's anti-illegal immigration law (before it is signed into law).
Next: Remember when folks around here liked tractors?
From: FACE on 22 Apr 2010 13:54 On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:37:56 -0700 (PDT), in alt.politics.immigration, "?" <breoganmacbrath(a)yahoo.com>, wrote >> Frankly, I suggest you write to Mr. Obama about your views. Be sure to let >> him know that, as a black man, you don't think he should have been elected >> president. > >The reason that Obama shouldn't have been elected is that he's not >constitionally qualified to serve as POTUS, not being a US citizen. Whatever the rest of this is about, i probably could not care less, but that "as a black man" angle is really getting lame and trite. It is hard to think of another group so totally and abnormally racially dominated than the Democrats of the last couple of years.............. I really wonder if their reason is an assuaging of a perceived guilt by projection or an attempt to expiate of their own animus.
From: S'mee on 22 Apr 2010 14:35 On Apr 22, 10:08 am, "Datesfat Chicks" <datesfat.chi...(a)gmail.com> wrote: SNIP > Frankly, I'd pay to be reading your letter back to you while the Secret > Service is tasering you repeatedly. heh, go ahead. I'll sell the ppv rights and make mint. > I'd pay even more to do the tasering while the Secret Service reads the > letter to you. Just don't get in my way. I've got dibs for giving him riot baton massage...after 25years I still know where to hit to cause the most pain without killing. 8^)
From: Twibil on 22 Apr 2010 14:39 On Apr 22, 10:54 am, FACE <AFaceInTheCr...(a)today.net> wrote: > > > Whatever the rest of this is about, i probably could not care less, but > that "as a black man" angle is really getting lame and trite. Sorry, but the truth doesn't stop being the truth just because it's an old truth. In fact, that's how things -such as the value of pi- become "trite". > It is hard to think of another group so totally and abnormally racially > dominated than the Democrats of the last couple of years.............. Really? You're not thinking very hard. How about the plethora of white hate groups/militias that have spring up since Obama's election? Are these somehow immune to being "racially dominated"? It's difficult to see how that could be, because they're pretty much 100% white, and their reason for existance is primarily that Obama is black. > I really wonder if their reason is an assuaging of a perceived guilt by > projection or an attempt to expiate of their own animus. Yeah! That's the ticket! Pretend to be an intellectual and opine that the first political party to nominate a black man for President did so out of "perceived guilt". And when every racist prick in the nation screams their head off after said black man is actually elected (and the Democrats, being no fools, take note of that fact) claim the Democrats are only pointing out this blatant racisim because of "an attempt to expiate their own animus". Good thinking.
From: Datesfat Chicks on 22 Apr 2010 15:43 "?" <breoganmacbrath(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:259ce782-c4f5-44c4-b784-b43d396a3e89(a)c20g2000prb.googlegroups.com... On Apr 22, 9:08 am, "Datesfat Chicks" <datesfat.chi...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > "?" <breoganmacbr...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > Frankly, I suggest you write to Mr. Obama about your views. Be sure to let > him know that, as a black man, you don't think he should have been elected > president. > >The reason that Obama shouldn't have been elected is that he's not >constitionally qualified to serve as POTUS, not being a US citizen. I believe that argument has been settled. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/citizen.asp If you have credible evidence to the contrary ... > Also be sure to let him know that, as a black man, he isn't > equal to you. > >You just can't get it through your head that the US of A wasn't >founded on the principle of racial equality, can you? Why, exactly, does that matter? That is the accepted norm now. Datesfat
From: Doug on 22 Apr 2010 16:26
"?" <breoganmacbrath(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:91e67e77-d0f2-4379-b6a3-f7a8cab338f4(a)h31g2000prl.googlegroups.com... This could be a way to get control of all the anchor babies in the USA! Invalidate their birth certificates and ake them prove that all their great great grandparents were America citizens (like mine were). Puerto Rico to Invalidate Every Birth Certificate Born before July 1, 2010? You'll have to reapply Newser) � Talk about an extreme way to tackle identify theft: This July Puerto Rico will invalidate every birth certificate it has handed out. Its 4 million residents, and the 1.2 million Puerto Ricans living in the US, will then have to reapply for the document. The government hopes the radical decision will cut down on fraud, which is so rampant that an estimated 40% of US passport fraud cases center around Puerto Rican birth certificates, many of which are sold on the black market for thousands, reports ABC News. To wit: Though about 45,000 children were born in there in 2008, the country's vital statistics office issued some 860,000 certified copies. Part of the problem may also stem from the fact that Puerto Ricans hand out such copies like one would a resume or business card, making them easy to get a hold of. "I don't know why we do it," said a government director. But "anybody who grew up in Puerto Rico saw it happen." http://www.newser.com/story/86605/puerto-rico-to-invalidate-every-birth-certificate.html ******************************** Puerto Rico takes the steps the corrupt US government won't. LOL, I wonder how Puerto Rico would handle Obama? |