UKRM Film Club: Inception
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
Prev: FOAK: eBay quandary
Next: Californication
From: ogden on 30 Jul 2010 06:15 darsy wrote: > On Jul 30, 10:49 am, ogden <og...(a)pre.org> wrote: > > darsy wrote: > > > > And, similarly, I read Ogden's post as "I want to see Toy Story 3 but > > > not in 3D". > > > > To clarify, I'm not particularly enthusiastic about seeing it at all, > > but I flat-out refuse to endure it in 3D. > > fair enough. > > I'm going to see The A-Team tomorrow morning, apparently. In my mind, your life takes the form of a series of sitcom clichés. First it was the recently unemployed breadwinner, spending his days sitting in the park, forlornly feeding his packed lunch to the sparrows. Now it's Ralph Bates at the zoo. -- ogden | gsxr1000 | ktm duke 2
From: Champ on 30 Jul 2010 06:22 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:07:17 -0700 (PDT), darsy <darsyx(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Personally, I think he's wrong, and 3D is the future. >My opinion is that it has it's place, but I don't think a lot of >movies would be in any way improved by being in 3D. Actually, that's a more nuanced view, and better reflects what I think. It certainly does have it's place, tho, and is far more than gimmick, imo. -- Champ We declare that the splendor of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed. ZX10R | Hayabusa | GPz750turbo neal at champ dot org dot uk
From: darsy on 30 Jul 2010 06:30 On Jul 30, 11:15 am, ogden <og...(a)pre.org> wrote: > darsy wrote: > > I'm going to see The A-Team tomorrow morning, apparently. > > In my mind, your life takes the form of a series of sitcom clichés. > > First it was the recently unemployed breadwinner, spending his days > sitting in the park, forlornly feeding his packed lunch to the sparrows. you have some funny ideas. Though I walk through one all the time, I can't remember the last time I actually sat in a park. And Enfield Town park is full of geese, not sparrows. > Now it's Ralph Bates at the zoo. who? <fx: googles> never heard of it. And I've also not been to a zoo in >30 years. -- d.
From: Ace on 30 Jul 2010 06:33 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:03:56 +0100, Champ <news(a)champ.org.uk> wrote: >On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:05:51 +0200, Ace <b.rogers(a)ifrance.com> wrote: >>And I've been ill a lot recently (hence my higher-than-normal posting >>volume, not that anyone would notice) so I need perking up a bit. > >Only a few months to the ski season... Just two... <looks at date> and a week.
From: darsy on 30 Jul 2010 06:33
On Jul 30, 11:22 am, Champ <n...(a)champ.org.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:07:17 -0700 (PDT), darsy <dar...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> Personally, I think he's wrong, and 3D is the future. > >My opinion is that it has it's place, but I don't think a lot of > >movies would be in any way improved by being in 3D. > > Actually, that's a more nuanced view, and better reflects what I > think. It certainly does have it's place, tho, and is far more than > gimmick, imo. well, to clarify further, I think in some cases it could in fact be considered "gimmicky", but some recent 3D movies have used it to great effect. One of the complaints I've heard personally (and repeatedly) is that having to wear the "3D glasses" is very annoying if you wear actual vision correction glasses already. -- d. |