UKRM Film Club: Inception
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
Prev: FOAK: eBay quandary
Next: Californication
From: Ace on 30 Jul 2010 06:42 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:33:39 -0700 (PDT), darsy <darsyx(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Jul 30, 11:22�am, Champ <n...(a)champ.org.uk> wrote: >> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:07:17 -0700 (PDT), darsy <dar...(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> Personally, I think he's wrong, and 3D is the future. >> >My opinion is that it has it's place, but I don't think a lot of >> >movies would be in any way improved by being in 3D. >> >> Actually, that's a more nuanced view, and better reflects what I >> think. �It certainly does have it's place, tho, and is far more than >> gimmick, imo. > >well, to clarify further, I think in some cases it could in fact be >considered "gimmicky", but some recent 3D movies have used it to great >effect. > >One of the complaints I've heard personally (and repeatedly) is that >having to wear the "3D glasses" is very annoying if you wear actual >vision correction glasses already. I imagine they're pretty annoying even if you don't.
From: darsy on 30 Jul 2010 06:47 On Jul 30, 11:42 am, Ace <b.rog...(a)ifrance.com> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:33:39 -0700 (PDT), darsy <dar...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >One of the complaints I've heard personally (and repeatedly) is that > >having to wear the "3D glasses" is very annoying if you wear actual > >vision correction glasses already. > > I imagine they're pretty annoying even if you don't a bit, for sure. Though the modern polarized glasses are a lot less annoying than the older red/green lensed ones. -- d.
From: ogden on 30 Jul 2010 06:54 darsy wrote: > On Jul 30, 11:22 am, Champ <n...(a)champ.org.uk> wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:07:17 -0700 (PDT), darsy <dar...(a)gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > >> Personally, I think he's wrong, and 3D is the future. > > >My opinion is that it has it's place, but I don't think a lot of > > >movies would be in any way improved by being in 3D. > > > > Actually, that's a more nuanced view, and better reflects what I > > think. It certainly does have it's place, tho, and is far more than > > gimmick, imo. > > well, to clarify further, I think in some cases it could in fact be > considered "gimmicky", but some recent 3D movies have used it to great > effect. > > One of the complaints I've heard personally (and repeatedly) is that > having to wear the "3D glasses" is very annoying if you wear actual > vision correction glasses already. Same as it ever was. -- ogden | gsxr1000 | ktm duke 2
From: Champ on 30 Jul 2010 07:05 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:59:29 +0100, boots <boots(a)despammed.com> wrote: >On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:23:43 +0100 in uk.rec.motorcycles, ogden says: > >>I've got to see Toy Story 3 on Saturday. It's almost impossible to find >>an evening showing that isn't in sodding 3D. I'm sure it's wonderful, >>but it really isn't my cup of tea. >Due to her BF having made errors in time management my youngest took >me to see that on Wednesday. I was pretty underwhelmed TBH, weak >story[1] and the 3D effect was pretty wank. Not for the first time, I fnd myself with a diametrically opposed view on a movie to someone on ukrm. I thought it was brilliantly done, and really emotional and moving for adult viewers. And, as Kermode also said, the 3D was completely unobtrusive. Either it was hardly there (and therefore a bit pointless), or it was brilliantly subtle. -- Champ We declare that the splendor of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed. ZX10R | Hayabusa | GPz750turbo neal at champ dot org dot uk
From: ginge on 30 Jul 2010 07:14
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:22:02 +0100, Champ <news(a)champ.org.uk> wrote: >On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:07:17 -0700 (PDT), darsy <darsyx(a)gmail.com> >wrote: > >>> Personally, I think he's wrong, and 3D is the future. > >>My opinion is that it has it's place, but I don't think a lot of >>movies would be in any way improved by being in 3D. > >Actually, that's a more nuanced view, and better reflects what I >think. It certainly does have it's place, tho, and is far more than >gimmick, imo. Don't be an early adopter, wait for 3.1D! |