Prev: Why is UKRM more active than Reeky?
Next: Hopefully ...
From: Higgins on 19 Nov 2009 14:33 Champ wrote: > On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:42:27 -0800 (PST), "TOG(a)Toil" > <totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> My company has announced that henceforth we won't receive paper >> payslips. There will be electronic payslips, accessible by the >> intranet. > >> It strikes me that moving payroll records security from behind the >> corporate system (which is pretty secure) and placing it in the hands >> of Vanilla Windoze operators is not a bright thing to do. Any >> compromised PC will yield some nice ID theft material. Company says >> the system is secure, and adds that secuirty of your own PC is your >> own responsibility. I'm saying that the company's own system is likely >> to be considerably more secure. > > <shrug> > > I'm disinclined to take security worries seriously from someone who > refuses to use ATM machines. > That's different as it's protected by his PIN number
From: Champ on 19 Nov 2009 15:34 On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:33:44 +0100, Higgins <the.best.names.are.gone(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Champ wrote: >> I'm disinclined to take security worries seriously from someone who >> refuses to use ATM machines. >That's different as it's protected by his PIN number heh. You got me. -- Champ We declare that the splendor of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed. ZX10R | Hayabusa | GPz750turbo neal at champ dot org dot uk
From: Higgins on 19 Nov 2009 15:52 boots wrote: > On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:33:44 +0100 in uk.rec.motorcycles, Higgins > says: > >> That's different as it's protected by his PIN number > ^^^^^^^^^ > > Arghhhh > Can I claim a whoosh?
From: Higgins on 19 Nov 2009 15:55 Champ wrote: > On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:33:44 +0100, Higgins > <the.best.names.are.gone(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Champ wrote: > >>> I'm disinclined to take security worries seriously from someone who >>> refuses to use ATM machines. > >> That's different as it's protected by his PIN number > > heh. You got me. RAS syndrome, apparently :)
From: YTC#1 on 19 Nov 2009 16:20
TOG(a)Toil wrote: > On 19 Nov, 15:00, YTC#1 <b...(a)ytc1-spambin.co.uk> wrote: >> TOG(a)Toil wrote: >>> My company has announced that henceforth we won't receive paper >>> payslips. There will be electronic payslips, accessible by the >>> intranet. >> Did your payslip go through the post ? >> > No. Handed out on payday. And, how did they get to the person that hands it out ? I bet they are not printed on site. -- Bruce Porter XJR1300SP, XJ900F, GSX250, Pegaso 650 Trail POTM#1(KoTL), WUSS#1 , YTC#1(bar), OSOS#2(KoTL) , DS#3 , IbW#18 ,Apostle#8 "The internet is a huge and diverse community and not every one is friendly" http://www.ytc1.co.uk There *is* an alternative! http://www.openoffice.org/ |