Prev: Why is UKRM more active than Reeky?
Next: Hopefully ...
From: Champ on 19 Nov 2009 16:37
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:52:05 +0100, Higgins
<the.best.names.are.gone(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>boots wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:33:44 +0100 in uk.rec.motorcycles, Higgins
>> says:
>>
>>> That's different as it's protected by his PIN number
>> ^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> Arghhhh

>Can I claim a whoosh?

You know, I think you can!
--
Champ
We declare that the splendor of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed.
ZX10R | Hayabusa | GPz750turbo
neal at champ dot org dot uk
From: ginge on 19 Nov 2009 17:28
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:42:27 -0800 (PST), "TOG(a)Toil"
<totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>My company has announced that henceforth we won't receive paper
>payslips. There will be electronic payslips, accessible by the
>intranet.

Mine's been electronic for about 2 years and I get emailed a PDF once
a month. I just keep the emails archived in their own folder within
my email archive.

I can't see how they could easily enforce what you do with them, and
suspect the reason they don't want them saved on local machines is so
one member of staff doesn't see somebody elses payslip due to a
careless mistake on a shared machine.

If you're concerned save them on a password protected USB key or
similar.
From: ginge on 19 Nov 2009 17:37
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:29:45 -0000, "Beav"
<beavis.original(a)ntlwoxorld.com> wrote:

>I even opted
>out of the NHS spine for the simple reason that thre's no such thing as a
>properly secure electronic database. If it's accessible to one, it can be
>accessed by others and not necessarily authorised folk either.

Are you aware you're channeling today's Dilbert?

http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2009-11-19/
From: Champ on 19 Nov 2009 18:32
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:28:43 +0000, ginge
<the.gingeREMOVE(a)THISgmail.com> wrote:

>I can't see how they could easily enforce what you do with them, and
>suspect the reason they don't want them saved on local machines is so
>one member of staff doesn't see somebody elses payslip due to a
>careless mistake on a shared machine.

Why would that be 'wrong'? Surely, it's your information, and up to
you what you do with it.

I could leave my paper payslip clearly visible on my desk, if I
wanted. I could scan it and put in on the internet. It's my data.
--
Champ
We declare that the splendor of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed.
ZX10R | Hayabusa | GPz750turbo
neal at champ dot org dot uk
From: ginge on 19 Nov 2009 18:49
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:32:57 +0000, Champ <news(a)champ.org.uk> wrote:

>On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:28:43 +0000, ginge
><the.gingeREMOVE(a)THISgmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I can't see how they could easily enforce what you do with them, and
>>suspect the reason they don't want them saved on local machines is so
>>one member of staff doesn't see somebody elses payslip due to a
>>careless mistake on a shared machine.
>
>Why would that be 'wrong'? Surely, it's your information, and up to
>you what you do with it.
>
>I could leave my paper payslip clearly visible on my desk, if I
>wanted. I could scan it and put in on the internet. It's my data.

Sure it is, but there's the possibility that doing so would cause your
employer issues if somebody (or several people) earning less found out
and made a fuss.

And that may mean your employer wouldn't want it happening, so despite
it being unenforceable, could state a policy.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Prev: Why is UKRM more active than Reeky?
Next: Hopefully ...