This is really disturbing
in [Motorcycles]
|
Prev: Latest mod to the 750SS "ultralight"
Next: Means, Motives, and Opportunities as Iarnbored makes HUGE stinking turd pile in newsgroups by hating peace and worshipping war criminals Bush and Cheney
From: Henry on 18 May 2010 13:50 MikeWhy wrote: > Datesfat Chicks wrote: >> "MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam(a)yahoo.com> wrote >>> Datesfat Chicks wrote: >>>> "Henry" <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote >>>>> Guilty... >>>>> http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0515/guilty-verdict-ohio-cop-shot-unarmed-motorcyclist/ >>>> Wow. I think the article was matter-of-fact. Instead of repeating >>>> the command, he pulled the trigger. >>>> Ouch ouch ouch. >>> Ouch? A young man in the prime of his youth lies paralyzed, and the >>> entire thought is "Ouch"? As though this isn't the foreseeable >>> outcome of arming traffic detail and meter maids? A caning with a >>> feather duster is excessive use of force in connection with traffic >>> statute infractions. It seems plain to me that everyone, and I mean >>> police departments and every news video junkie, has lost their sense >>> of perspective. The world has gone mad. How many honestly think >>> meaningful police reforms are coming any time soon? >> >> I've always been of the opinion that nearly all people who get shot >> by the police bring it on themselves in one way or another. Usually >> it involves insensitivity to the officer's fear for his own life. For >> example, it is ill-advised to reach for paperwork in the glove >> box before the officer has arrived at your window. It is also >> ill-advised to keep your hands in your pockets (especially loose >> pockets), etc. >> Even the Diallo shooting has some ill-advised behavior by Mr. Diallo. >> >> However, looking at the shooting video -- that could have been me. >> When my starter switch and headlight went suddenly inoperative one >> night the Marshall police stopped me. I didn't want to turn off the >> bike (the starter switch was inoperative), so I motioned for the >> officers to come forward. They responded by turning on the >> extra-bright lights ... I knew at that time that anything further I >> did was just going to make them more suspicious, so I turned off the >> bike and got off to chat with them. I knew that doing anything else >> was going to escalate their suspicion and perhaps escalate the >> situation. >> They did not shoot. >> >> But my behavior was just as suspicious and perhaps just as >> threatening as the victim in the video. >> >> He did nothing to deserve what he got. >> >> "Ouch" wasn't strong enough. You are correct. > > I don't intend anything personal in this. Your thoughts and reactions > are my expectations for the general public. It's this general acceptance > of the status quo that I'm speaking out against. > > It should be general knowledge but somehow escaped public notice that > you and I are not just empowered but are morally bound to intercede and > make felony arrests. The only real difference, then, between us and > uniformed police is they are also empowered to arrest for misdemeanors > and statute infractions. And for that difference, we assign to them > power of life and death in the most insanely simple and common > situations. Can you imagine yourself drawing on and then firing on > someone for jaywalking? How far is that from what we all saw in this > video? Yes, it could have been you. > > The real crime and issue here is not simple speeding. Once the cop is on > the scene, the real issue is compliance and respect for the uniform. > We've given them too much power. Just write the damn ticket and let's > both just get on with our lives. I doubt the guys on the bikes even knew that a cop was behind them when they took off from the intersection. They seemed surprised when the cop car lit up, and they both stopped. The guy who was shot didn't do anything that I would consider threatening or suspicious. The cop was a nut job. He'll have plenty of time to think about it in prison, but the guy on the bike is screwed for life.... -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: Vito on 18 May 2010 14:06 Henry wrote: >> The cop was >> a nut job. He'll have plenty of time to think about it in prison, but >> the guy on the bike is screwed for life.... Bwahahaha! God you do live in a dream world. The cop will never go to prison.
From: Henry on 18 May 2010 14:16 Vito wrote: > Henry wrote: >>> The cop was >>> a nut job. He'll have plenty of time to think about it in prison, but >>> the guy on the bike is screwed for life.... > Bwahahaha! God you do live in a dream world. The cop will never go to > prison. Because, we "all" "know" that no cop has ever gone to prison, just like no government has ever planned or carried out a false flag terror attack, right Veto? <g> -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: S'mee on 18 May 2010 14:34 On May 18, 12:06 pm, "Vito" <v...(a)cfl.rr.com> wrote: > Henry wrote: > >> The cop was > >> a nut job. He'll have plenty of time to think about it in prison, but > >> the guy on the bike is screwed for life.... > > Bwahahaha! God you do live in a dream world. The cop will never go to > prison. Oh? I suppose being convicted would obviate your response...which he was.
From: S'mee on 18 May 2010 14:35
On May 18, 12:16 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > Vito wrote: > > Henry wrote: > >>> The cop was > >>> a nut job. He'll have plenty of time to think about it in prison, but > >>> the guy on the bike is screwed for life.... > > Bwahahaha! God you do live in a dream world. The cop will never go to > > prison. > > Because, we "all" "know" that no cop has ever gone to prison, just > like no government has ever planned or carried out a false flag terror > attack, right Veto? <g> A new record for you! Two lies in one sentence... |