Prev: Wet Sump vs Dry Sump
Next: Working on a gas tank
From: Keith Schiffner on 14 Jun 2007 23:40 "Stephen!" <NO(a)spam.com> wrote in message news:Xns994FD9A9F8DA0smvsmv(a)216.196.97.142... > "tomorrow(a)erols.com" <tomorrow(a)erols.com> wrote in > news:1181876826.404665.263810(a)g37g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > >>> Hey Don!! Harley's SUCK! They're slow. They can't even go fast >>> enough to get out of their own way. Every one of them sounds like a >>> 55 gallon drum full of stones rolling down a flight of stairs. Their >>> owners only have them to make up for physical deficiencies and only >>> ride them far enough to get to the next bar! >> >> Hey! I can ride my Harley far enough to get to SEVERAL bars! > > All in one day? (Anything east of the Ol' Miss don't count...) I think he meant bar ditch to bar ditch...
From: Rayvan on 15 Jun 2007 00:23 On Jun 14, 4:54 pm, "Stephen!" <N...(a)spam.com> wrote: > > So not only are they terribly under powered, they're also horrible > inefficient... Seems if there's that much burnable material left in the > exhaust you'd want to burn it off in the power stroke. No, they're not underpowered or eneffiecient. My Harley gets better mileage (almost 50mpg) than my overpowered Kawasaki Z1000 (a bit over 30mpg) even if I baby the Kawasaki. The Harley also runs twice as far on a tank of fuel, and it's far more comfortable. It requires much less engine/driveline maintenance to boot. Like I said, HP isn't eveything. The Harley has the same 0-60 and Q-M times as a Porsche or a Corvette. Are Porsches and Corvettes underpowered too, or is there an idiotic *double standard? *If there is an idiotic double standard (there is), I simply choose to not subscribe to it, therefore I'm perfectly happy with the power of my Harley and can enjoy much less maintenance than that of the Kawasaki. Pretty dern efficient if you ask me! -- Rayvan
From: Rayvan on 15 Jun 2007 00:30 On Jun 14, 4:59 pm, langkd_NO_S...(a)shaw.ca (Road Glidin' Don) wrote: > > LOL. Was there anything correct in that post? > > Guys knowing nothing about Harleys telling other people who nothing > about Harleys about Harleys. What a source of information Reeky is, > huh? ;) The part about the waste spark burning leftover hydrocarbons got me laughing hysterically! -- Rayvan
From: David Steuber on 15 Jun 2007 01:12 "Dave" <dspear99ca(a)yahoo.delete.com> writes: > As my dear mom used to beat into me "your priveleges end where someone > elses' begin." Your mom got that wrong. Your priveleges end when you are in my scope reticle. -- I will not be a puppet to a corporation! --- Faye006
From: The Older Gentleman on 15 Jun 2007 02:22
Rayvan <rvannuland(a)cachevision.com> wrote: > On Jun 14, 4:59 pm, langkd_NO_S...(a)shaw.ca (Road Glidin' Don) wrote: > > > > > LOL. Was there anything correct in that post? > > > > Guys knowing nothing about Harleys telling other people who nothing > > about Harleys about Harleys. What a source of information Reeky is, > > huh? ;) > > The part about the waste spark burning leftover hydrocarbons got me > laughing hysterically! Heh. I must say I had to reach up and pull my eyebrows back down to their normal place. -- BMW K1100LT 750SS CB400F CD250 SL125 GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60 ANORAK#06 YTC#3 BOF#30 WUSS#5 The bells, the bells..... |