From: Ace on
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 23:05:04 -0000, "'Hog"
<sm911SPAM(a)hotmailCHIPS.co.uk> wrote:

>Wicked Uncle Nigel <wun(a)wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote:

>> I do love it when Americans call California "Stalinist".
>>
>> It makes me laugh.

Me too. Especially as it betrays such a woeful ignorance of the
difference between Stalinism and Communism/Socialism, which they think
are all the same thing.

>I've not heard it before!
>I'm not at all sure what it meant.

California has one or two laws which are slightly less right-wing and
veering towards what the yanks would call 'liberal' attitudes. It's
one of the reasons that it's the only part of the US I can actually
stand to be in.

Sadly, our Palo Alto office has closed down and all functions moved to
South San Francisco. Shame, as PA's a really nice little student town,
and hardly American at all.

From: Doki on

"'Hog" <sm911SPAM(a)hotmailCHIPS.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hfheam$nqr$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> Stephen Cowell <stephenleeNOSPAMcowell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "In the 1990s, the United Kingdom Atomic Energy
>> Authority started to implement plans to
>> decommission, disassemble and clean up both
>> piles; the decommissioning is now partially
>> complete. However, Pile 1 still contains about 15
>> tonnes (14.76 L/T) of highly unstable uranium
>> fuel, and final completion of the decommissioning
>> is not expected until at least 2037."
>>
>> Out of sight, out of mind, eh?
>
> It keeps people in jobs for life FFS and I'm all for that

Broken window fallacy. Their jobs for life cost us all.

From: Doki on

"Ace" <b.rogers(a)ifrance.com> wrote in message
news:69hph5586pgnbeu1nnqs5knn4gcouaacm8(a)4ax.com...
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 23:05:04 -0000, "'Hog"
> <sm911SPAM(a)hotmailCHIPS.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Wicked Uncle Nigel <wun(a)wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote:
>
>>> I do love it when Americans call California "Stalinist".
>>>
>>> It makes me laugh.
>
> Me too. Especially as it betrays such a woeful ignorance of the
> difference between Stalinism and Communism/Socialism, which they think
> are all the same thing.

Indeed. The standard of American political debate makes us look marvellous.
Anyone suggesting anything that doesn't involve bending over for a
corporation is immediately branded a Communist. They nearly scuppered their
bank bail out plans arguing about it.

From: M J Carley on
In the referenced article, "Doki" <mrdoki(a)gmail.com> writes:

>Indeed. The standard of American political debate makes us look
>marvellous. Anyone suggesting anything that doesn't involve bending
>over for a corporation is immediately branded a Communist. They
>nearly scuppered their bank bail out plans arguing about it.

In fairness, Obama is also being called a `socialist' because the
government did bail out the banks.
--
Si deve tornare alle basi: Marx ed i Clash.

Michael Carley: http://people.bath.ac.uk/ensmjc/

From: ogden on
M J Carley wrote:
> In the referenced article, "Doki" <mrdoki(a)gmail.com> writes:
>
> >Indeed. The standard of American political debate makes us look
> >marvellous. Anyone suggesting anything that doesn't involve bending
> >over for a corporation is immediately branded a Communist. They
> >nearly scuppered their bank bail out plans arguing about it.
>
> In fairness, Obama is also being called a `socialist' because the
> Bush administration did bail out the banks.

Post corrected.

--
ogden