and these guys run nuclear power stations....
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
From: M J Carley on 7 Dec 2009 05:08 In the referenced article, ogden <ogden(a)pre.org> writes: >M J Carley wrote: >> In fairness, Obama is also being called a `socialist' because the >> Bush administration did bail out the banks. > >Post corrected. Obama supported the bail-out when he was a candidate and he has extended it in office. -- Si deve tornare alle basi: Marx ed i Clash. Michael Carley: http://people.bath.ac.uk/ensmjc/
From: TOG on 7 Dec 2009 05:36 On 7 Dec, 03:04, "tomor...(a)erols.com" <tomorrowaterolsdot...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Dec 6, 10:34 am, Andy Bonwick <nos...(a)bonwick.me.uk> wrote: > > > On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 13:42:27 +0000, Simon Wilson > > > <siwil...(a)NODAMNSPAMN.hotmail.com> wrote: > > >The SO[1] Renault's heater fan finally gave up the ghost this weekend. > > > What have Renault got to do with nuclear power stations? > > > If you wanted to rate technical ability to run a power station against > > ability to build an up to date means of transport then I wouldn't look > > any further than our cousins across the water and HD. > > > <waves> > > > Hi guys. > > Kinduva boring Sunday over there, eh? Looks like :-)))
From: ogden on 7 Dec 2009 05:42 M J Carley wrote: > In the referenced article, ogden <ogden(a)pre.org> writes: > >M J Carley wrote: > > >> In fairness, Obama is also being called a `socialist' because the > >> Bush administration did bail out the banks. > > > >Post corrected. > > Obama supported the bail-out when he was a candidate and he has > extended it in office. Sure, but I was pointing out the hypocrisy. -- ogden
From: Leszek Karlik on 7 Dec 2009 06:46 On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:09:35 +0100, steve auvache <dont_spam(a)thecow.me.uk> wrote: [...] >> How long will it take the the great majority of the population to wake >> up and small the roses? > I expect it will be when they get the half life of the waste down to > below some 10s of thousands of years. What's one generation's "hazardous waste" is another's generation valuable resource. :-) > So cheap it won't be worth metering energy carries with it a legacy of > death that simply cannot be ignored, even for short term financial gain. EVERY form of energy, even the expensive ones, carries with it a legacy of death that is routinely ignored. Coal energy has much more deaths per one TWh than nuclear energy. Heck, rooftop solar has more deaths per TWh than nuclear energy (working at heights is dangerous). Even wind power has more deaths per TWh than nuclear energy. However, the voters don't care about hard data, they make their decisions based on emotions. -- Leszek 'Leslie' Karlik NTV 650
From: J�r�my on 7 Dec 2009 06:47
"S'mee" <stevenkeith2(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:25fb2e6d-3ec2-487e-b8a5- d76f6f9433f6(a)k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com: > Well, I didn't think it fair to call them socialist scum in this > thread as it is cross posted. <shrug> Then again I've always figured > the US has been trying to slowly creep it's way to being a socialist > country since the early 1930's instead of remaining the represenative > republic it started as. It's rather interesting as the sheep haven't > even noticed it creeping up. http://xkcd.com/610/ -- Jeremy R1200RT |