Blimey, that was a pile up!
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
Prev: Am I getting older ...
Next: Top Gear
From: ogden on 2 Aug 2010 11:07 Krusty wrote: > I can't think of a single thing on BBC these days that wouldn't exist > if it wasn't for 'the unique way we're funded', other than maybe some > stuff I'm a bit too thick to appreciate. Well said. -- ogden | gsxr1000 | ktm duke ii
From: CT on 2 Aug 2010 11:07 Krusty wrote: > ogden wrote: > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pastry_fork > > > > Peasant. > > People use a fork for eating cakes?!? Poofs. It's worse than that - they use a fork for eating cakes *whilst standing up*! I mean, can't they afford a table and chairs, FFS? -- Chris
From: Adrian on 2 Aug 2010 11:14 "Krusty" <dontwantany(a)nowhere.invalid> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> > Mostly unemployed single parents. >> Nobody is forcing them to have a TV they can't afford to run. > No, they're being forced to pay for a service they may not want just > because they've got a TV. Umm, no, they're paying for having a TV. If they don't want it, they don't have to have it.
From: Champ on 2 Aug 2010 11:21 On 2 Aug 2010 14:45:53 GMT, "CT" <me(a)christrollen.co.uk> wrote: >ginge wrote: > >> That should be free. Especially when people don't like pastry. >Champ aside, who wouldn't like pastry? Life would hardly be worth >living without pies... ....and you're living proof of that. -- Champ We declare that the splendour of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed. ZX10R | Hayabusa | GPz750turbo neal at champ dot org dot uk
From: steve auvache on 2 Aug 2010 11:26
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:23:25 +0000 (UTC), "Krusty" <dontwantany(a)nowhere.invalid> wrote: >ginge wrote: > >> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:17:33 +0100, "Hog" >> <sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk> wrote: >> >> > ginge wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:06:17 +0100, "Hog" >> >> <sm911SPAM(a)CHIPShotmail.co.uk> wrote: >> > > > >> >> > Mostly unemployed single parents. >> >> Nobody is forcing them to have a TV they can't afford to run. > >No, they're being forced to pay for a service they may not want just >because they've got a TV. Where they is a number less than the total of consumers in this green and pleasant land who are forced to pay for advertising they may or may not want at the point of sale. The obvious difference being where and how they collect the money but in our system for some strange reason the once a year payment seems to product a better product than the continuous drain every time you put your hand in your pocket and considerably less need for marketing types. -- steve auvache |