Not a typical day [longish]
in [UK Motorcycles]
|
Prev: With regard to the "Rage Against The Machine for Christmas Number One" campaign
Next: Petrol pipe blocked - help
From: 'Hog on 21 Dec 2009 09:33 Champ wrote: > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:48:43 -0000, "'Hog" > <sm911SPAM(a)hotmailCHIPS.co.uk> wrote: > >> "Champ" <news(a)champ.org.uk> wrote in message >> news:k4uii5ltcr2a0mkrhjktdn9pkcvf7d5eu4(a)4ax.com... >>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:44:36 -0000, "'Hog" >>> <sm911SPAM(a)hotmailCHIPS.co.uk> wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> Just so you know - I don't respond to trolls. > >> Who is Trolling? I wasn't. > > Yeah, you always say that, usually after saying something trollish > about public executions. No, you simply chose not to consider the question or an answer -- 'Hog
From: Champ on 21 Dec 2009 09:52 On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:33:53 -0000, "'Hog" <sm911SPAM(a)hotmailCHIPS.co.uk> wrote: >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>> Just so you know - I don't respond to trolls. >> >>> Who is Trolling? I wasn't. >> >> Yeah, you always say that, usually after saying something trollish >> about public executions. >No, you simply chose not to consider the question or an answer OK, Mr Troll, here's your chance to defend your Trollish behaviour. You said: "So do you think they should have been executed in public after their 3rd or 4th or 5th offence rather than inflicting the 20th on you?" So, do you *genuinely* believe that public executions are the way you would deal with the issue of low level youth crime? -- Champ We declare that the splendour of the world has been enriched by a new beauty: the beauty of speed. ZX10R | Hayabusa | GPz750turbo neal at champ dot org dot uk
From: Leszek Karlik on 21 Dec 2009 10:01 On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:52:35 +0100, Champ <news(a)champ.org.uk> wrote: [...] > So, do you *genuinely* believe that public executions are the way you > would deal with the issue of low level youth crime? This idea is indeed complete rubbish. The proper way to deal with the issue of low level youth crime is of course mass deportations to Australia. -- Leszek 'Leslie' Karlik NTV 650
From: steve auvache on 21 Dec 2009 10:12 In article <bq2vi559552a1kg0smute7di7lc8j581a5(a)4ax.com>, Champ <news(a)champ.org.uk> writes >On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:33:53 -0000, "'Hog" ><sm911SPAM(a)hotmailCHIPS.co.uk> wrote: > >>>>> <snip> >>>>> >>>>> Just so you know - I don't respond to trolls. >>> >>>> Who is Trolling? I wasn't. >>> >>> Yeah, you always say that, usually after saying something trollish >>> about public executions. > >>No, you simply chose not to consider the question or an answer > >OK, Mr Troll, here's your chance to defend your Trollish behaviour. > >You said: "So do you think they should have been executed in public >after their 3rd or 4th or 5th offence rather than inflicting the 20th >on you?" > >So, do you *genuinely* believe that public executions are the way you >would deal with the issue of low level youth crime? As a solution to the problem of ridding society of the Simon Cowell Effect[1] the idea has great merit. [1] Where the SCE includes but is not limited to, crimes against popular culture and good taste. -- steve auvache
From: 'Hog on 21 Dec 2009 10:36
Champ wrote: > On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:33:53 -0000, "'Hog" > <sm911SPAM(a)hotmailCHIPS.co.uk> wrote: > >>>>> <snip> >>>>> >>>>> Just so you know - I don't respond to trolls. >>> >>>> Who is Trolling? I wasn't. >>> >>> Yeah, you always say that, usually after saying something trollish >>> about public executions. > >> No, you simply chose not to consider the question or an answer > > OK, Mr Troll, here's your chance to defend your Trollish behaviour. > > You said: "So do you think they should have been executed in public > after their 3rd or 4th or 5th offence rather than inflicting the 20th > on you?" > > So, do you *genuinely* believe that public executions are the way you > would deal with the issue of low level youth crime? This being a NG and UKRM I may flower up the language but my obvious underlying point is capital punishment applied to a 3 Strikes Then You Are Out policy which has always seemed reasonable to me. That's 3 *serious* (1) detected property/against a person crimes for which conventional penalties are imposed and on the 4th offence it's a bullet. You might even couch that inside a time frame if you choose, for liberal effect, say 20 years. Currently there are a significant number of people who inflict a large volume of crime and they do it dozens or hundreds of times, causing chaos, and Plod manages to detect at least a few of those. (1) I count theft of a motorcycle secured in a garage as serious -- 'Hog |