Prev: Emergency flange nuts
Next: Background checks and further information: advice, please
From: Paul Carmichael on 7 Jul 2010 12:00
Vass escribió:

>
>
> "Paul Carmichael" <wibbleypants(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:89jh2nFagjU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>> Looking at adverts, it seems if I buy the camera, I can't take pictures
>> with
>> it until I buy a lens?
>>
> Here you go
> http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-canon-eos-500d-digital-slr-
plus-18-55mm-lens/p1031146
>
> EOS 500D with Kit lens £ 588.99

Have you purchased from them?

--
Paul.
CBR1100XX SuperBlackbird (Buen mueble de patio), Orbea Dakar
BOTAFOT #4 BOTAFOF #30 MRO #24 OMF #15 UKRMMA #30
http://paulcarmichael.org/ (content pending)
From: ginge on 7 Jul 2010 12:31
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 16:51:39 +0100, "Kevin Stone"
<newsaccount(a)hotpop.com> wrote:

>>>Canon has current range in order here:
>>
>> 400d has a higher spec than 1000d.
>
>Higher in what way? On some fronts it's equal, but I don't think it's higher
>anywhere.

400d has
9 point autofocus vs 7 point.
10 raw frame vs 3 raw frame continuous shooting so 1000d is far worse
4 level noise reduction vs 1
And the winnder for me is the 400d takes "grown up" CF cards, vs toy
SD ones, so is worth keeping as a second camera body alongside a 50d
when i eventually upgrade...


From: ginge on 7 Jul 2010 12:32
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 16:52:09 +0100, "Nige" <deead(a)btinternet.com>
wrote:

>CT wrote:
>> Champ wrote:
>> [snip info]
>>
>>> Buy some magazines, and see what the reviewers are saying.
>>
>> I've always found this site useful: http://www.dpreview.com/
>
>Like ''m clicking that at work :)

It's legit.
From: Kevin Stone on 7 Jul 2010 12:38
> 400d has
> 9 point autofocus vs 7 point.
> 10 raw frame vs 3 raw frame continuous shooting so 1000d is far worse

Do you actually get 10 raws? I know both the 1000D and 500D aren't that
good.

--
Kev


From: ginge on 7 Jul 2010 12:46
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 17:38:16 +0100, "Kevin Stone"
<newsaccount(a)hotpop.com> wrote:

>> 400d has
>> 9 point autofocus vs 7 point.
>> 10 raw frame vs 3 raw frame continuous shooting so 1000d is far worse
>
>Do you actually get 10 raws? I know both the 1000D and 500D aren't that
>good.

using decent CF cards (sandisk or lexar 133x) I reckon it's more like
7-8 before a slight pause then the whole thing drops to about 1.5 FPS
for a few more shots, then gets stuck for a moment. Usable though.

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Prev: Emergency flange nuts
Next: Background checks and further information: advice, please