From: ogden on
Paul Carmichael wrote:
> frag escribió:
>
> > In article <89tolgF5rjU1(a)mid.individual.net>, wibbleypants(a)gmail.com
> > says...
>
> >> > Not in the picture but I'm near 100% sure that the 1000D comes with an
> >> > IS lens as standard.
> >>
> >> Wrong :-(
> >
> > That's a pity but what you have now you can still enjoy experimenting
> > with and learning about for years before you need to go out and buy
> > other lensii.
> >
> > Note that's need (if at all) and not want. Want is a whole different and
> > bloody expensive ballgame :)
> >
>
> I was just playing and snapped the wife with the long lens. When I was
> looking through the viewfinder, I thought hell!, I'm going to need a tripod.
> The image was everywhere, but on looking at the picture, it was actually
> quite good. I suppose that's because it was very bright and therefore the
> idiot mode had set the snappage

shutter speed

> to very quick mode, thereby preventing blur?
>
> Have I got the terminology right?

Almost. Try doing the same thing in low light and you'll be stuffed.

--
ogden | gsxr1000 | rgv250

From: Catman on
Paul Carmichael wrote:
> frag escribió:
>
>> In article <89tolgF5rjU1(a)mid.individual.net>, wibbleypants(a)gmail.com
>> says...
>
>>>> Not in the picture but I'm near 100% sure that the 1000D comes with an
>>>> IS lens as standard.
>>> Wrong :-(
>> That's a pity but what you have now you can still enjoy experimenting
>> with and learning about for years before you need to go out and buy
>> other lensii.
>>
>> Note that's need (if at all) and not want. Want is a whole different and
>> bloody expensive ballgame :)
>>
>
> I was just playing and snapped the wife with the long lens. When I was
> looking through the viewfinder, I thought hell!, I'm going to need a tripod.
> The image was everywhere, but on looking at the picture, it was actually
> quite good. I suppose that's because it was very bright and therefore the
> idiot mode had set the snappage to very quick mode, thereby preventing blur?
>

s/idiot/full automatic
s/snappage/shutter speed
s/very quick/very fast[1]
> Have I got the terminology right?


Close enough for me to understand :)


[1] Well, quick might do, but I always heard of fast shutter speeds.

--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 GTV TS GT 3.2 V6
Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see.
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
From: Owen on
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 20:15:36 +0100, ogden <ogden(a)pre.org> wrote:

>Paul Carmichael wrote:
>> frag escribi�:
>>
>> > In article <89tolgF5rjU1(a)mid.individual.net>, wibbleypants(a)gmail.com
>> > says...
>>
>> >> > Not in the picture but I'm near 100% sure that the 1000D comes with an
>> >> > IS lens as standard.
>> >>
>> >> Wrong :-(
>> >
>> > That's a pity but what you have now you can still enjoy experimenting
>> > with and learning about for years before you need to go out and buy
>> > other lensii.
>> >
>> > Note that's need (if at all) and not want. Want is a whole different and
>> > bloody expensive ballgame :)
>> >
>>
>> I was just playing and snapped the wife with the long lens. When I was
>> looking through the viewfinder, I thought hell!, I'm going to need a tripod.
>> The image was everywhere, but on looking at the picture, it was actually
>> quite good. I suppose that's because it was very bright and therefore the
>> idiot mode had set the snappage
>
>shutter speed
>
>> to very quick mode, thereby preventing blur?
>>
>> Have I got the terminology right?
>
>Almost. Try doing the same thing in low light and you'll be stuffed.

Take no notice, the light levels wont affect the terminology...


--
Owen
From: SIRPip on
frag wrote:

> other lensii.

I'm watching you, tallboy.

--
SIRPip : B12
From: jgh on
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:37:49 +0100, Switters wrote:
> On Linux there's F-Spot as a default photo organiser, but I believe it
> imports all the photos, making copies, which is a bit pants.

So tick the box telling it not to.

- Stick