How to save Harley Davidison
in [Motorcycles]
|
Prev: Proper oil for cruisers
Next: 9-11 was an inside job.
From: Henry on 16 Jul 2010 11:11 don (Calgary) wrote: > The Older Clown obsessed: >> don (Calgary) <hd.flhr(a)telus.net> wrote: >>> The regular staff comprises of 100 men and two women. >> And this from the man who accuses me of not writing with clarity? >> <Amused> > Little more than a typo. > > Is this the kind of ankle biting you are now reduced to? > It's been a long fall but you are nearing the bottom. You'll know he's there when he slithers off behind his killfile to lie endlessly about what you've written and even what you do for a living. A beaten "man" is a pitiful thing to see... <g> -- "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -- Albert Einstein. http://911research.wtc7.net http://www.journalof911studies.com/ http://www.ae911truth.org
From: TOG on 16 Jul 2010 11:11 On 16 July, 15:06, "don (Calgary)" <hd.f...(a)telus.net> wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 07:26:18 +0100, totallydeadmail...(a)yahoo.co.uk > > (The Older Gentleman) wrote: > >don (Calgary) <hd.f...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > >> The regular staff > >> comprises of 100 men and two women. > > >And this from the man who accuses me of not writing with clarity? > > ><Amused> > > Little more than a typo. Nope, rather more than that. Typos I tend to ignore unless they're funny and apposite (which they often are). This is you criticising my writing in one post and making a howling illiterate error in another. Don't you know it's almost a law that if you criticise someone's spelling/grammar/punctuation, you'll screw up yourself? Usually it's just a slip of the keyboard, but this ain't.
From: don (Calgary) on 16 Jul 2010 11:40 On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:11:18 -0700 (PDT), "TOG(a)Toil" <totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >On 16 July, 15:06, "don (Calgary)" <hd.f...(a)telus.net> wrote: >> On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 07:26:18 +0100, totallydeadmail...(a)yahoo.co.uk >> >> (The Older Gentleman) wrote: >> >don (Calgary) <hd.f...(a)telus.net> wrote: >> >> >> The regular staff >> >> comprises of 100 men and two women. >> >> >And this from the man who accuses me of not writing with clarity? >> >> ><Amused> >> >> Little more than a typo. � > >Nope, rather more than that. Typos I tend to ignore unless they're >funny and apposite (which they often are). > >This is you criticising my writing in one post and making a howling >illiterate error in another. > >Don't you know it's almost a law that if you criticise someone's >spelling/grammar/punctuation, you'll screw up yourself? Usually it's >just a slip of the keyboard, but this ain't. *squirm*wriggle*squirm* You mudt have a sifferent keyboars layout than the redt of ud so. lol
From: TOG on 16 Jul 2010 11:50 On 16 July, 16:40, "don (Calgary)" <hd.f...(a)telus.net> wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:11:18 -0700 (PDT), "TOG(a)Toil" > > > > > > <totallydeadmail...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >On 16 July, 15:06, "don (Calgary)" <hd.f...(a)telus.net> wrote: > >> On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 07:26:18 +0100, totallydeadmail...(a)yahoo.co.uk > > >> (The Older Gentleman) wrote: > >> >don (Calgary) <hd.f...(a)telus.net> wrote: > > >> >> The regular staff > >> >> comprises of 100 men and two women. > > >> >And this from the man who accuses me of not writing with clarity? > > >> ><Amused> > > >> Little more than a typo. > > >Nope, rather more than that. Typos I tend to ignore unless they're > >funny and apposite (which they often are). > > >This is you criticising my writing in one post and making a howling > >illiterate error in another. > > >Don't you know it's almost a law that if you criticise someone's > >spelling/grammar/punctuation, you'll screw up yourself? Usually it's > >just a slip of the keyboard, but this ain't. > > *squirm*wriggle*squirm* > > You mudt have a sifferent keyboars layout than the redt of ud so. You do *know* what you got wrong, don't you? Just to be certain, like? You *are* aware what you did wrong? Because if you don't that really *does* prove my point, and I've a sneaking suspicion that you don't.
From: TOG on 16 Jul 2010 11:55
On 16 July, 16:37, "don (Calgary)" <hd.f...(a)telus.net> wrote: > You are no different than the many Harley haters that have cruised > through this forum, blind to the facts and stubborn in their opinions. <chortle> You silly sod. I don't hate Harleys at all. In fact, a browse through this forum will show several references which I made to the effect that I might actually *buy* one[1]. Can't you get *anything* right? (For the record, I've loved some I've ridden, like a couple of early Evos - the Low Rider Convertible sticks in the mind - and a couple I've hated, like a pre-rubber mount 1200 Sportster which was just bloody awful, and a 1998 Road King which was positively dangerous.) [1] Actually, many moons ago, I put down a deposit on an 883. A fortnight later a stinging tax bill arrived[2] and that put paid to that. [2] Inland Revenue lost my details, sent mail to our old address whose inhabitants didn't forward it, and when they did find out where we were sent a huge estimated tax bill which had to be paid and then reclaimed. Got the money back, but it knocked the 883 on the head and somehow I never got around to trying to buy another. HoHum. |